word change requested for "to scrub"

Richard -Gilligan- Uschold uschold@cs.ucf.edu
Thu, 09 Aug 2001 15:10:45 +0000


My first thought was "rebalance"

"fix unbalanced" is a bit more accurate then "find unbalanced"

Gilligan

"James A. Treacy" wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 03:33:30PM +0200, Christian Stimming wrote:
> >
> > However, since at least Ben and me were convinced of that other wrong
> > semantics, it seems necessary to find a better name for that operation
> > (as grib quickly suggested). Here's a list of proposals -- please,
> > native English speakers, pick your favorite word and give some comments.
> >
> Why not use 'find unbalanced transactions'? If that is too long, 'find
> unbalanced'.
>
> This has two good features. First, the word find makes it
> unthreatening - the action will not go and change things behind your
> back. Words like cleanse, and most of the other words you suggested,
> lead people (who don't read documentation) to think it could do
> something dangerous. Second, it is descriptive.
>
> --
> James (Jay) Treacy
> treacy@debian.org
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-devel mailing list
> gnucash-devel@lists.gnumatic.com
> http://www.gnumatic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel

--

Gilligan            |                    __o           .oooO
                   /|                  _ \<,_          (   )
                  /p|\                (_)/ (_)          \ (   Oooo.
                 /  | \             ------------         \_)  (   )
                ========                                       ) /
                 ========       gilligan@mpinet.net           (_/
             ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~   uschold@cs.ucf.edu