price-db storage via BackEnd?
Derek Atkins
warlord@MIT.EDU
21 May 2001 14:48:35 -0400
Sigh.. Configurating is always a "hard" thing.
I suppose we might want to re-examine what we consider "application
configuration" and what we consider "gnc(file) meta-data".
-derek
Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu> writes:
> linas@linas.org (Linas Vepstas) writes:
>
> > dimwit question: are you sure you want to make your configs global?
> > It seems it might be nice to have different configs on different
> > machines ...
>
> I've discussed this with Bill and Dave at various points, and I think
> the upshot is that in the long run, some options need to be per
> machine (i.e. per-user per-machine -- in ~/*), and some need to be
> per-user per-data file, i.e. stored in the data file per-user.
>
> There are several reasons for this, not the least of which is that as
> we store more and more complex "report setups", a user accessing the
> same data file from home and from work would expect their complex
> report configurations to show up both places, and further, as this
> per-user data gets to be a more substantial amount of information, you
> don't want to end up with a monotonically increasing size for the
> user's home directory. i.e. unless this data is stored in the data
> file, when you delete the data file, the corresponding (useless)
> config data will remain in the users ~/.gnucash/ directory until the
> end of time. (Bad behavior IMO.)
>
> So data that's file-specific should go in the file, and data that's
> machine specific should go in the user's home directory. Right now
> we're not doing that, but IMO we should be. However, to do it
> completely right may require "fixing" other people's infrastructure
> like Gnome MDI. As it stands, MDI stores the document config info you
> give it (and it's config info) in your home directory, even though
> that info may only apply to a given data file (in our case, a given
> .gnc file). With this arrangement, when you delete that file, Gnome
> MDI has no way of knowing about it, and so the data will just stay
> around forever -- not a scalable approach, really.
>
> One solution would be for Gnome MDI to have an API that allows you to
> tell it to give you the data it wants stored, and to ask you for that
> data when it needs it (i.e. at file open time). That seems like a
> much cleaner approach for situations like ours.
>
> --
> Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
warlord@MIT.EDU PGP key available