Moving reconciled transactions

[David Hampton]

--=-ohQSzK5p4dkEaUgGdadO
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 2002-08-11 at 07:30, Derek Atkins wrote:
> True.  If you change a reconciled split in this manner it should warn
> you and, if you still continue, it should reset the reconcile flag (or
> at least ask you what to do).
>=20
> Note that I don't know what happens if you change the account on the
> 'current' split.  The txn should disappear as soon as you commit it.

It does.

> > Deleting this particular split entry is a great way to imbalance a
> > transaction. (Its probably a bug that this particular split, the one
> > connecting the transaction to the currently open account, can be changed
> > or deleted.)
>=20
> I don't want to think about this.  But yea, the user can really shoot
> themselves in the foot.  Does gnucash not detect imbalanced
> transactions at this point?  If so, that's a bug.

Not until you check for imbalanced transactions.

> Personally, I think the logic in the split-ledger-control.c:...traverse()
> is broken.  I also think it's broken in the entryledger..

Broken how?

David



--=-ohQSzK5p4dkEaUgGdadO
Content-Type: application/DEFANGED-109648; name="signature_asc.DEFANGED-109648"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQA9Vo1xlSwHWMdNRQQRAobTAKDGfDffrj5oPA1op8hpM3DSMc6IQQCbBIFx
k4sBnX90Ec3Uw1shC/Rfvqk=
=kc38
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-ohQSzK5p4dkEaUgGdadO--