chris at wilddev.net
Sun Apr 6 19:03:17 CDT 2003
On Sun, 2003-04-06 at 13:19, Derek Atkins wrote:
> linas at linas.org (Linas Vepstas) writes:
> > Derek,
> > feedback please.
> Well, hopefully others have opinions, too ;)
Indeed I do :)
> > Basic GUI:
> > The goal of the basic GUI is to handle most usages of
> > most lots in most places. There also need to be special-purpose
> > dialogs for specific applications, e.g. stocks, inventory, etc.
> > Shows three areas:
> > -- list of lots, one of which can be highlighted.
> > Lot names can be edited in-place.
> Do lots need to have names, necessarily?
I think names for lots would make it easier for users to associate the
lot with a particular transaction, there could be other ways of showing
this though, like using a date/time format for example. Or if it was a
read-only name a drop down list of lots to choose from to display.
> > -- contents of a single lot (displayed in a narrow,
> > mini-register view, showing only date, memo, quant,
> > balance)
> You might want to also show the value and value-balance...
> Also, does this necessarily need to be a register? Are you planning
> to allow users to edit values in place? Or is this just data for
> display? If it's just for display, we can probably do something like
> the 'reconcile window' where you have two lists side-by-side with
> various split-parameters displayed.
> One of the things on my todo list is break out the "reconcile-list"
> widget into a more general 'query-display-list' widget, where you can
> supply the list of what data to show, etc. However, this is a
> "read-only" pseudo-register, which might not be what you want...
> > -- list of splits not in any lot.
> > (not clear if screen real-estate allows side-by-side
> > placement, or if this must be above/below. above/below
> > would suck)
> I think it depends what you want to show. If you want to make
> it a full register then I don't think we can do it side-by-side.
> OTOH, using the query-display-list could allow you to have two
> of them side-by-side.
If the gui was just a mechanism to move unassociated splits into a lot
then I think a side-by-side UI like the reconcile window would work
well. I'm not to sure what you're wanting to do with the UI either. I
agree above/below would suck tho.
> > Shows various buttons:
> > -- two arrows, which move split into/out of lot.
> > This is a traditional way of moving something from one
> > list to another, but some UI designers argue against this.
> > Is there a better way to move splits into/out-of a lot?
> Probably not.. Maybe drag-and-drop, or a combo-box of "open lots"?
Drag 'n' drop would be nice in a lot of places in GnuCash, I remain
hopeful someone will come along and make copying transactions with it
one day :)
RedHat Certified Engineer #807302549405490.
Checkpoint Certified Security Expert 2000 & NG
| | |^|
| |^| | | Life out here is raw
| | |^| | But we will never stop
| |_|_| | We will never quit
| / __> | cause we are Metallica
|/ / |
More information about the gnucash-devel