UI independance

[Dave Peticolas]

On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 12:57, Christopher Browne wrote:
> I think it's fair to say that by the time SOAP could /conceivably/ reach
> a level of maturity that would allow it to be generally adopted, CORBA
> will have been mature, having had implementations that have been
> efficiently interoperating for a goodly 5 years or more.
> 
> Why go with something that will continue to be flaky for years to come
> when there's an /already mature/ technology that is /already part of
> GNOME/?

Sure, as I said in my original message, I wasn't advocating SOAP,
just objecting to what I thought was a misleading statement. But
you are both right, CORBA is more mature and better supported in
Gnome. I think a set of GnuCash bonobo controls that could be
embedded in other apps would be a very nice addition to GnuCash,
not that I am volunteering to write them :)

dave

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20030213/9bb1f1e4/attachment.bin