GNOME 2 port patches [10]

[Jan Arne Petersen]

On Tue, 27 May 2003 18:05:37 -0500, linas at linas.org (Linas Vepstas) wrote:

> > I don't believe that the code is 'really' unstable because it is already
> > used in some other applications (like epiphany) and i never noticed any
> > problems with this applications (related to that code). Maybe it isn't
> 
> By 'unstable' I didn;t mean 'crashes', I really meant 'will change
> in the future'.  Since people already complain about how hard it is to
> build gnucash ... 

Ok, that shouldn't be a problem, because the code is copied.

> > 'really' stable but it is at last more stable than any code which we could
> > create to do the same tasks if we don't want to use libegg.
> 
> OK, copying in is OK.   FWIW, the policy that we used to have was that
> we would copy stuff to the /lib directory, instead of /src, so if you
> wanted to, you could put *all* of libegg into /lib.
> 
> I don't know where you put that code, but if you didn't put it in /lib,
> then please think about moving it there.

Ok, i'll move it there (i didn't notice the lib directory yet).

Regards
	Jan Arne Petersen
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20030528/7ef3795f/attachment.bin