Commitment to gnome2 port

[David Hampton]

On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 13:04, Jon Lapham wrote:
> > True...  The way I would say it is that new UI (glade/etc.) should be
> > g2, but anything non-UI (reports/engine/backend) should be HEAD...
> > 
> 
> Woohoo, this is great to hear.  Is this the position of the other 
> developers? 

Not today.  Give me two weeks and I might change my mind. :-)  From my
point of view it really depends on how extensive the new GUI code will
be and what widgets it will use.

David

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-devel/attachments/20030904/caddaeac/attachment.pgp