Commitment to gnome2 port

Jon Lapham lapham at extracta.com.br
Thu Sep 4 18:04:46 CDT 2003


Derek Atkins wrote:
[snip]
> I'll note that MOST of the lot/period/sql support is UI-agnostic.
> Reports are UI-agnostic, too.  Anything UI-agnostic can (and IMHO
> should) still be done on HEAD.
> 
> Basically, I do not WANT to have a 1.10 release.  I want the next
> release to be 2.0.  Is that what you want to hear?  I consider 1.10
> a "failsafe contingency plan."

[snip]
> 
> 
> True...  The way I would say it is that new UI (glade/etc.) should be
> g2, but anything non-UI (reports/engine/backend) should be HEAD...
> 

Woohoo, this is great to hear.  Is this the position of the other 
developers?  If so, we need to make this known.

-- 
-**-*-*---*-*---*-*---*-----*-*-----*---*-*---*-----*-----*-*-----*---
  Jon Lapham  <lapham at extracta.com.br>          Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
  Work: Extracta Moléculas Naturais SA     http://www.extracta.com.br/
  Web: http://www.jandr.org/
***-*--*----*-------*------------*--------------------*---------------




More information about the gnucash-devel mailing list