Commitment to gnome2 port
Jon Lapham
lapham at extracta.com.br
Thu Sep 4 18:04:46 CDT 2003
Derek Atkins wrote:
[snip]
> I'll note that MOST of the lot/period/sql support is UI-agnostic.
> Reports are UI-agnostic, too. Anything UI-agnostic can (and IMHO
> should) still be done on HEAD.
>
> Basically, I do not WANT to have a 1.10 release. I want the next
> release to be 2.0. Is that what you want to hear? I consider 1.10
> a "failsafe contingency plan."
[snip]
>
>
> True... The way I would say it is that new UI (glade/etc.) should be
> g2, but anything non-UI (reports/engine/backend) should be HEAD...
>
Woohoo, this is great to hear. Is this the position of the other
developers? If so, we need to make this known.
--
-**-*-*---*-*---*-*---*-----*-*-----*---*-*---*-----*-----*-*-----*---
Jon Lapham <lapham at extracta.com.br> Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Work: Extracta Moléculas Naturais SA http://www.extracta.com.br/
Web: http://www.jandr.org/
***-*--*----*-------*------------*--------------------*---------------
More information about the gnucash-devel
mailing list