a.rottmann at gmx.at
Tue Jul 6 10:22:59 EDT 2004
[ CC'ing g-wrap-dev, guile-gtk-general. The discussion is about that
since G-Wrap now comes without GLib bindings, the GnuCash folks have a
dependency more, which they seem utterly opposed to ]
linas at linas.org (Linas Vepstas) writes:
> My take on this? g-wrap should probably be a standard part of guile,
> or swig, or something, and not a stand-alone package.
- Ad bundling it with Guile: would mean _way_ too slow releases
- with SWIG: You wouldn't suggest bundling e.g. Python with Perl, would you?
I could vaguely imagine bundling G-Wrap with the core guile-gnome
module (guile-glib), but I'm not at all convinced that this would be a
good thing. What do the other guile-gnome developers think about that?
Andreas Rottmann | Rotty at ICQ | 118634484 at ICQ | a.rottmann at gmx.at
http://yi.org/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://yi.org/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62
Latein ist das humanoide Äquivalent zu Fortran.
-- Alexander Bartolich in at.linux
More information about the gnucash-devel