test routines
Neil Williams
linux at codehelp.co.uk
Tue Aug 16 11:08:04 EDT 2005
On Tuesday 16 August 2005 3:45 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Neil Williams <linux at codehelp.co.uk>:
> > The guile bindings at this stage would only be removed from the *test*
> > routines - I won't change the structure of the actual modules until
> > you've had a chance to test my proposed patch.
>
> Yea.. that seems to make sence to me.. At least from within the QOF
> code. Even once it's spun out the scheme bindings should still be
> tested from
> GnuCash.
Yes - e.g. I won't change the test-load type routines but then those won't be
in either QOF or CashUtil.
> Oh. I see. yea, this should probably be fixed.. Unless we change the
> pricedb
> to be a QOF object ;)
I'd thought of that, hadn't got around to it yet. It's a little different as
there is only one db per book, unlike other objects.
> > My patch today includes temporary #ifdef rules so that CashUtil can build
> > the file without the customised QofBackend struct. Those will be removed
> > later.
>
> *sigh* We do have a lot of special-casing, don't we? :(
Definitely. :-(
> > So it produces no guile or g-wrap dependencies? Will it run on a base
> > system, something that say only has the CLI version of emacs? Are there
> > systems with Glib but without scheme?
>
> There is a build-time dependency on /usr/bin/guile. There is no dependency
> on g-wrap, and there is no runtime dependency on either guile OR g-wrap.
Fine, that's that one solved.
--
Neil Williams
=============
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-devel/attachments/20050816/c83d3eb3/attachment.bin
More information about the gnucash-devel
mailing list