Problem with QOF_TYPE_COLLECT

[Neil Williams]

On Wednesday 06 July 2005 3:50 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> > Why do we have these duplicate names defined? What's the advantage? It
> > makes it more difficult because in Anjuta I can right click each
> > function to go to it's definition or declaration - if it's defined as
> > another name, that doesn't work.
> >
> > Anyways, it's actually calling qof_class_get_parameter, as shown in the
> > error report.
>
> Sorry, what duplicate names?

Where an API function is redefined with a new name e.g.
$ cd gnucash-gnome2/src/engine/
$ grep "define gnc" *.h

Most, in this case, are from gncObject.h, QueryCore.h and QueryNew.h

Are these all deprecated? Should they be?

Are they just historical or is there an advantage?

-- 

Neil Williams
=============
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-devel/attachments/20050717/1ca72ed1/attachment.bin