On Gnucash, G2, and Architecture
dan at widyono.net
Tue Jun 7 11:45:10 EDT 2005
> If it only works as well as 1.x, why are users going to be any more
> pleased with g2 than 1.x? Do you think the average user knows and
> cares what libraries their acct package uses?
No, but they care what libraries are included with their plug-and-play
distribution (where said distro's maintainers *do* care what libs are used by
whatever acct package they choose to support). If said distro decides to
stop supporting gnome1, gc is gone also unless there's a new gc version which
doesn't require gnome1.
> Ok, I think I'm starting to see where we disagree. You think that the
> survival of GC depends on maintaining *users*.
I believe they're also talking about developers. I, for one, would like to
see a stable, used version of g2 out there, such that my coding (if I could
program worth a damn) would continue to be used, seen, and therefore tested
by current users.
> The *linux* app. market is not so much like that. Market-share
> follows quality much more closely than time-to-market. Look at how
> quick we are to abandon the tried-and-true when the new program is a
> little nicer.
This does not match what I hear from regular users (non-computer-savvy).
They follow whatever their distro vendor provides for the most part. "The
distro doesn't have an accounting package? Woops, I can't use Linux then.
Back to Windows."
More information about the gnucash-devel