Where the cursor ends up after delete split
Derek Atkins
warlord at MIT.EDU
Sun May 22 00:01:36 EDT 2005
"Edward J. Huff" <ejhuff at huff20may77.us> writes:
> Here is what I think now: after a delete split, the cursor
> should always end up on the next split after the one which
> was deleted. Any other behavior is counterintuitive and
> unexpected. The above minor disaster does not happen if
> the cursor acts as it ought to.
>
> Unless anyone can tell me why it shouldn't do that, (or that
> it's already fixed in g2 -- I haven't built g2 yet...), I'll
> file a bug report so it gets on the to-do list. Probably
> I will also fix it but maybe not immediately.
Sounds reasonable to me.
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
warlord at MIT.EDU PGP key available
More information about the gnucash-devel
mailing list