Where the cursor ends up after delete split

Derek Atkins warlord at MIT.EDU
Sun May 22 00:01:36 EDT 2005


"Edward J. Huff" <ejhuff at huff20may77.us> writes:

> Here is what I think now:  after a delete split, the cursor
> should always end up on the next split after the one which
> was deleted.  Any other behavior is counterintuitive and
> unexpected.  The above minor disaster does not happen if
> the cursor acts as it ought to.
>
> Unless anyone can tell me why it shouldn't do that, (or that
> it's already fixed in g2 -- I haven't built g2 yet...), I'll 
> file a bug report so it gets on the to-do list.  Probably
> I will also fix it but maybe not immediately.

Sounds reasonable to me.

-derek
-- 
       Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
       Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
       URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/    PP-ASEL-IA     N1NWH
       warlord at MIT.EDU                        PGP key available


More information about the gnucash-devel mailing list