libqof change - not complete yet.
Neil Williams
linux at codehelp.co.uk
Mon Nov 7 11:20:29 EST 2005
On Monday 07 November 2005 4:04 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Is there any particular reason the libqof move wasn't /ONE/ changeset?
To separate the Makefile.am changes from the simply copying of the files. I
didn't want people to have to sift through a >1Mb diff to find what's been
changed in configure.in or src/engine/Makefile.am so I committed those first.
I couldn't then use svn move because I had to have tested with the files
already moved, so I used svn remove and svn add.
> Also, this is why IMHO you should use an lndir tree for builds so that
> you don't
> accidentally add in temp-files.
lndir ? Sorry, I don't know what that means.
:-(
P.S. It's testing fine so far after r11883.
I'm building two trees, one with external QOF, one with internal.
--
Neil Williams
=============
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-devel/attachments/20051107/09169a0b/attachment.bin
More information about the gnucash-devel
mailing list