libqof change - not complete yet.

Neil Williams linux at codehelp.co.uk
Mon Nov 7 11:20:29 EST 2005


On Monday 07 November 2005 4:04 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Is there any particular reason the libqof move wasn't /ONE/ changeset?

To separate the Makefile.am changes from the simply copying of the files. I 
didn't want people to have to sift through a >1Mb diff to find what's been 
changed in configure.in or src/engine/Makefile.am so I committed those first. 
I couldn't then use svn move because I had to have tested with the files 
already moved, so I used svn remove and svn add.

> Also, this is why IMHO you should use an lndir tree for builds so that
> you don't
> accidentally add in temp-files.

lndir ? Sorry, I don't know what that means.
:-(

P.S. It's testing fine so far after r11883.

I'm building two trees, one with external QOF, one with internal.

-- 

Neil Williams
=============
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-devel/attachments/20051107/09169a0b/attachment.bin


More information about the gnucash-devel mailing list