Confusion about use of G2

[Tim Wunder]

On 10/7/2005 1:47 PM, I believe that Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 10:36:59AM -0400, David Hampton wrote:
> 
>>On Sat, 2005-10-01 at 16:59 -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Nevertheless, I've been sitting on a stable, complete implementation
>>>of budgeting since the spring, (I actually use it for my own
>>>budgeting.) along with lots of other general improvements to
>>>e.g. tracing, testing, debugging, etc.  As soon as G2 is released and
>>>a "dev" branch opens I was planning on pushing for inclusion(^).
>>
>>>...
>>>
>>>(^) I know there's an incomplete budget in G2, I was expecting it to
>>>be removed for G2. 
>>
>>If what's in the tree is broken and needs to be pulled, and you're
>>sitting on a "stable complete implementation", then IMHO we clearly
>>should commit your code.
> 
> 
> Even though budgeting wasn't a 1.8 feature?  
> 
> OTOH, I wouldn't mind comitting the code and then just leaving the
> menu item off if we decide to release G2 without it.  But, it would be
> nice to get some more people using it, even if just in alpha.
> 
> -chris
> 
> 

I, for one, wouldn't mind test driving the budgeting features.

Regards,
Tim