DocBook - xml questions

[Chris Lyttle]

Neil Williams wrote:
> On Friday 14 April 2006 6:39 am, Bengt Thuree wrote:
>   
>>> 2)We should still follow the guidelines in HACKING?
>>>       
>
> These were added to support those who want to process the DocBook with SGML 
> tools instead of the automated XSL tools.
>   

I've never been happy with having this second set of docs in sgml, but I 
accepted at the time that there were no alternatives that let us 
generate pdf's and html without using it. I believe that is no longer 
the case and in fact valid pdf and html can be generated from the xml 
files. I will look into what it would take to do this.

Chris