SVN compile error
Thomas Bushnell BSG
tb at becket.net
Wed May 17 17:56:19 EDT 2006
Derek Atkins <warlord at MIT.EDU> writes:
> Quoting Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb at becket.net>:
>
>> Derek Atkins <warlord at MIT.EDU> writes:
>>
>>> The difference is that the 1.9.6 distribution was built from a working
>>> libtool, so the ltmain.sh included in the tarball is a non-broken version.
>>> Whereas people who compile from SVN on debian will use the debian libtool
>>> and therefore break.
>>
>> Unfortunately, the "working" libtool inserts incorrect (that is,
>> spuriously extra) libraries.
>
> Except in this case they are neither spurious NOR extra.. Who are YOU
> to decide they are? I'll also note that the libtool team upstream
> disagrees with your assessment, which is why they've continued to refuse
> to accept that patch from you. (You == Debian, not you specifically, TB).
What I mean is that *sometimes* they are spurious, not that they
always are.
More information about the gnucash-devel
mailing list