crypto grumble

[David Reiser]

I've been slowly climbing the gnucash dependency packaging cliff in  
fink. Provided I learned my lessons well enough, it should only take  
a week or two for aqbanking to get approved. Then the full version of  
gnucash can make it into the pipeline.

Since aqbanking and gwenhywfar will be in the crypto tree for the  
foreseeable future, while libofx and crypt::ssleay have escaped that  
fate, I'll only need to consider 2 packages for gnucash. Peter  
O'Gorman did the 1.x version as a splitoff, and that might work now  
too. But in any case, there will need to be a second name for the  
online banking capable gnucash (in the packaging realm -- execution  
still triggered as 'gnucash' either way)

Does anybody care what the two instances of gnucash are called? I'm  
presuming the gnucash+standard ofx import will just be called  
gnucash, while the aqbanking enabled instance will be gnucash-yyy.  
 From a make-it-plain-to-the-user perspective, I definitely don't  
want yyy to be 'crypto', but I'm not too fond of 'onlinebanking'  
either. The only reason I have any reservation about gnucash- 
aqbanking is that perhaps that isn't clear enough to the users, either.

Suggestions?

Dave
--
David Reiser
dbreiser at earthlink.net