crypto grumble

Christian Stimming stimming at tuhh.de
Wed Nov 15 03:57:59 EST 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

David Reiser schrieb:
> I've been slowly climbing the gnucash dependency packaging cliff in  
> fink. Provided I learned my lessons well enough, it should only take  
> a week or two for aqbanking to get approved. Then the full version of  
> gnucash can make it into the pipeline.

Very good! Well done.

> Does anybody care what the two instances of gnucash are called? I'm  
> presuming the gnucash+standard ofx import will just be called  
> gnucash, while the aqbanking enabled instance will be gnucash-yyy.  
>  From a make-it-plain-to-the-user perspective, I definitely don't  
> want yyy to be 'crypto', but I'm not too fond of 'onlinebanking'  
> either. The only reason I have any reservation about gnucash- 
> aqbanking is that perhaps that isn't clear enough to the users, either.

IMHO "gnucash-onlinebanking" should be fine. At least that's the most
clear wording for the average user, IMHO.

Is there an explanation somewhere online what the "crypto tree" of
gentoo means, in terms of differences to the "normal tree" or whatever
it's called? Just out of curiosity.

Regards,

Christian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQCVAwUBRVrWlmXAi+BfhivFAQI5RAQAhsL9Ag87qe1owcLslqdzShUZME6CCY8E
5Gkm3rvouLjWkjMASASSQyy+yKyjoXE981212RaeBEuVk21S3rcUUszXm/imHzB/
Ub2IPK+Vh41Q9LOPazGlce5b/3OzBmFYR4GKYj2DSi5rnEjg7HYM/dC+zetujf1o
j5Be2p2ff30=
=x5yQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the gnucash-devel mailing list