unofficial windows builds

[Nathan Buchanan]

On 4/9/07, Christian Stimming <stimming at tuhh.de> wrote:
>
> Am Freitag, 6. April 2007 17:51 schrieb Nathan Buchanan:
> > ok..I'll wait to hear what cstim was doing.
>
> In fact I *did* delete them, just as you said: I recorded the download
> number
> in the wiki, then deleted the file in the File Release System (FRS).
>
> I chose to do this because usually people are confused if there is more
> than
> one file of the same type under one release number, and the initial
> feedback
> hinted that people will *not* get the idea to take the highest version
> number. That's why I simply deleted the old unused files.


Sounds logical - I'll do the same.

> I am planning to built them once a week, and can upload them as often as
> > once a week (this is the plan). I'm not sure how often is optimal.
>
> Once a week should be fine, and once we have 2.1.x releases, somehow
> slower is
> enough.


ok

> On 4/6/07, Derek Atkins <warlord at mit.edu> wrote:
> > > I don't think you can "delete" old uploads, but I dont see where
> > > the older versions are, so...  I dont know what cstim was doing.
> > >
> > > How often do you plan to build releases?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > -derek
> > >
> > > "Nathan Buchanan" <nbinont at gmail.com> writes:
> > > > Hello Christian, Derek!
> > > >
> > > > I uploaded my first windows dev build to the unstable 2.0.99 release
> on
> > > > sourceforge. It was r15815. What do we normally do with the previous
> > > > version?
> > >
> > > > (r15667) Do we delete it and recored the number of downloads on the
> > > > wiki?
>