Re (IRC): 2.2.0 and auto-save

Josh Sled jsled at
Thu Jul 5 09:50:21 EDT 2007

Christian Stimming <stimming at> writes:
> Following this way of thought I would decide for choice #1, leave  
> as-is for 2.2.0. What do the other developers say?

I like option 3.

The implemented auto-save doesn't behave in the conventional way (with a
separate "checkpoint" file); it probably should before being enabled by

Regardless, some will still want the feature, especially since we have an
alternate mechanism for creating checkpoint files that could be used in the
case of an undesirable autosave.

...jsled - a=jsled;; echo ${a}@${b}
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 

More information about the gnucash-devel mailing list