meta-bug for 2.3/2.4
warlord at MIT.EDU
Sun Feb 22 07:19:53 EST 2009
Quoting Charles Day <cedayiv at gmail.com>:> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 8:01
Atkins <warlord at mit.edu> wrote:
>> No, we dont have one.. Generally we don't do a catch-all until after
>> we branch. It's not there to keep track of fixed bugs, it's there to
>> track of bugs yet-to-be backported.
>> You can already find bugs fixed for 2.3.x by a simple bugzilla query.
> So what's the proper thing to do for bugs like 426111, which was reported in
> version 2.0.5 but has just recently been fixed in trunk and is unlikely to
> be backported for 2.2? How do we remember to mark that bug "fixed" once we
> branch for 2.3 or 2.4?
If you don't expect the bug to get backported to 2.2 then just
mark it as fixed with a target of 2.3.x. Then in the comments
say "fixed in trunk in rXXXXX."
There's no need to "remember" to mark it fixed because you should
mark it fixed /now/
The only bugs that need to be remembered to be marked later
are bugs that are destined to be backported to the existing
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
warlord at MIT.EDU PGP key available
More information about the gnucash-devel