Patches for compile errors/warnings
Matt Lavin
matt.lavin at gmail.com
Thu Oct 29 18:24:34 EDT 2009
I've attached a new version of the patch that fixes my compile errors
and should keep the same function as before. I don't know why the
compiler likes my new version better, but it does.
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 18:54 -0400, Phil Longstaff wrote:
> On October 26, 2009 04:43:18 pm Matt Lavin wrote:
> > The first patch's main content was:
> >
> > - return (*((guint *) guid->data));
> > + return guid->data[0];
> >
> > That was the real compile error. I removed the two static functions
> > because they were functional duplicates of existing code and I thought it
> > would be better to reduce code duplication than to fix the same compiler
> > error in two spots. Of course, I didn't explain that and I should have.
> > The duplicate methods could be added back if they are needed for a reason I
> > overlooked.
>
> Won't that change the return value. Old value: contents of the first 4 bytes
> of data. New value: contents of the first 1 byte.
>
> Phil
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-devel mailing list
> gnucash-devel at gnucash.org
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
More information about the gnucash-devel
mailing list