Release 2.3.15 soon? What's still missing for 2.4.0?

[Phil Longstaff]

On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 13:15 -0700, J. Alex Aycinena wrote:
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Phil Longstaff <plongstaff at rogers.com>
> > To: Christian Stimming <stimming at tuhh.de>
> > Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2010 18:01:45 -0400
> > Subject: Re: Release 2.3.15 soon? What's still missing for 2.4.0?
> > On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 22:20 +0200, Christian Stimming wrote:
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> what about a 2.3.15 release somewhat soon? I think we've already improved on a
> >> number of remaining bugs so that a new version number would be very good.
> >>
> >> Also, I think this 2.3.15 would definitely be the string freeze release, and
> >> hopefully we won't need much more than maybe another 2.3.16 until we finally
> >> can make 2.4.0.
> >>
> >> Or in other words: Which issues are still open and preventing us from
> >> releasing a 2.4.0 from trunk right now? I don't know of any...
> >
> > Sounds good.  There is at least 1 bug on my list that should be fixed
> > and I've been slow getting to it.  I also find that "make check" now
> > fails with the dbi business object tests, so I'll need to chase that
> > down.
> >
> > Phil
> >
> 
> The patch attached to bug 625697 needs to be applied before 2.4.0
> because right now all reports using any style sheets other than
> default fail in trunk. The patch fixes that. I can't apply it myself
> and I need another developer to do it for me.

I downloaded this and tried it.  Before the patch, there was an error if
I switched a balance sheet from "Default" to "Easy".  After the patch,
the report appeared.  I then tried "Technicolor" and "Footer" and the
report was blank with no error for both of these.  I can apply this as
is since it does partially fix the problem or the patch can be tweaked
some more first.

Phil