Version references in documentation

Yawar Amin yawar.amin at gmail.com
Thu Aug 26 00:20:34 EDT 2010


Hi Tom,

On 2010-08-25, at 08:06, Tom Bullock wrote:

> [...]
> The next step is to review both log listings: code and documentation.  When that is done, then I submit my findings to this list to see what the developers' reaction is.  When the list is adjusted to a general consensus, it will be prioritized to become a documentation to-do list ordered by the perceived most urgent documentation need.
> 
> Hope that relates to your question.

Good plan. I'm going through the docs now to familiarise myself with them, and make the version number changes wherever possible. I'll post a patch to the list soon.

Regards,

Yawar

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-devel/attachments/20100826/0d154bed/attachment.bin>


More information about the gnucash-devel mailing list