Build problems after r19920

[Derek Atkins]

Mike Alexander <mta at umich.edu> writes:

> --On December 11, 2010 9:08:11 PM -0800 John Ralls
> <jralls at ceridwen.us> wrote:
>
>> Yes, and conceptually it makes sense for gnc-version.h (and its
>> companion, gnc-svnrevision.h) to be in core-utils instead of
>> gnome-utils. Neither has anything at all to do with gnome. I'll do
>> that tomorrow morning.
>
> I just checked in a change that does that.  With luck I didn't break
> things too badly.  It required changing some of the scripts used to
> generate the Windows install files.  Since I don't have a Windows
> machine to build on, I couldn't test that.  Someone should see if the
> Windows build still works.  I did run "make distcheck" to see if
> things were ok in the Unix build.  It looks like this hasn't been done
> for a while since it found some other errors.

I ran a complete make all check from scratch and it worked fine, so the
only potential problem might be existing build trees.  They might wind
up getting these files in multiple locations.

>        Mike

-derek

-- 
       Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
       Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
       URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/    PP-ASEL-IA     N1NWH
       warlord at MIT.EDU                        PGP key available