Next release 2.4.1? Branching stable and trunk sooner or later?

[Geert Janssens]

On Thursday 27 January 2011, Geert Janssens wrote:
> On Sunday 23 January 2011, John Ralls wrote:
> > On Jan 20, 2011, at 1:49 PM, John Ralls wrote:
> > > On Jan 20, 2011, at 12:47 PM, Christian Stimming wrote:
> > >> Developers,
> > >> 
> > >> we should decide when to make our next release 2.4.1, and what should
> > >> be included. In particular, we need to decide whether a 2.4.1 release
> > >> should be made from trunk (development) or whether be better want to
> > >> fork off a 2.4- stable branch where this 2.4.1 release is made from.
> > > 
> > > There are two things I'd like to get done before we release 2.4.1: I'd
> > > like to complete the version control for the sql backend (and I found
> > > yesterday that I've a bit more work to do on enforcing read-only on the
> > > qofbook) and I'd like to get a test in place for the fast-math bug in
> > > libdbi. I understand that the former is new functionality, but it's
> > > necessary protection for moving the architecture forward, and we need
> > > to have it in 2.4 in order to be able to safely change core in 2.6.
> > 
> > And they are now checked in, so I'm ready for 2.4.1 whenever.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > John Ralls
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnucash-devel mailing list
> > gnucash-devel at gnucash.org
> > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
> 
> I seem to have some issues with the table versioning that was added
> recently. I have an sqlite3 based book and whenever I open it, GnuCash
> tells me it's created with an old version and should be upgraded. If I
> click ok, the file is being re-saved, but the next time I open the file,
> it asks me the same question again.
> 
> I have this with a testfile (from the 2.3.x days) with just one transaction
> in it.
> 
> Geert

Hmm, it even happens with a completely new file, with only accounts in it (no 
transactions added yet).

Geert