Next release 2.4.1? Branching stable and trunk sooner or later?
Geert Janssens
janssens-geert at telenet.be
Thu Jan 27 16:17:13 EST 2011
On Sunday 23 January 2011, John Ralls wrote:
> On Jan 20, 2011, at 1:49 PM, John Ralls wrote:
> > On Jan 20, 2011, at 12:47 PM, Christian Stimming wrote:
> >> Developers,
> >>
> >> we should decide when to make our next release 2.4.1, and what should be
> >> included. In particular, we need to decide whether a 2.4.1 release
> >> should be made from trunk (development) or whether be better want to
> >> fork off a 2.4- stable branch where this 2.4.1 release is made from.
> >
> > There are two things I'd like to get done before we release 2.4.1: I'd
> > like to complete the version control for the sql backend (and I found
> > yesterday that I've a bit more work to do on enforcing read-only on the
> > qofbook) and I'd like to get a test in place for the fast-math bug in
> > libdbi. I understand that the former is new functionality, but it's
> > necessary protection for moving the architecture forward, and we need to
> > have it in 2.4 in order to be able to safely change core in 2.6.
>
> And they are now checked in, so I'm ready for 2.4.1 whenever.
>
> Regards,
> John Ralls
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-devel mailing list
> gnucash-devel at gnucash.org
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
I seem to have some issues with the table versioning that was added recently.
I have an sqlite3 based book and whenever I open it, GnuCash tells me it's
created with an old version and should be upgraded. If I click ok, the file is
being re-saved, but the next time I open the file, it asks me the same
question again.
I have this with a testfile (from the 2.3.x days) with just one transaction in
it.
Geert
More information about the gnucash-devel
mailing list