Validate GnuCash website
tim at filmchicago.org
Sat Jul 30 05:57:44 EDT 2011
XHTML 1.0 and HTML 4.01 Strict are nearly identical. Personally I like some
of the XHTML code styles betters (such as <br /> instead of <br></br>) so I
would shoot for that, but I would start off trying to get it to validate
against HTML 4.01 Transitional first.
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Derek Atkins <derek at ihtfp.com> wrote:
> On Fri, July 29, 2011 4:22 pm, Cristian Marchi wrote:
> > While working on the beta website, i just checked how it validates 
> > and there are many errors. I'm not an expert in this field so I'm asking
> > if it's worth to correct them? If yes, is it better to use a HTML 4.01
> > strict or a XHTML 1.0 strict doctype.
> I don't have an opinion here. Maybe others will.
> > Always talking about website, the Search page is not rendered correctly
> > . Does someone know what's going on?
> I know about the search page. I haven't had the chance to look into it.
> It's been broken since the upgrade to Fedora 15. And namazu is no longer
> part of Fedora. So perhaps we should just look for a new search engine?
> > Thanks for any advice.
> > Regards
> > Cristian
> > 
> >  https://lists.gnucash.org/search/
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnucash-devel mailing list
> > gnucash-devel at gnucash.org
> > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
> Derek Atkins 617-623-3745
> derek at ihtfp.com www.ihtfp.com
> Computer and Internet Security Consultant
> gnucash-devel mailing list
> gnucash-devel at gnucash.org
More information about the gnucash-devel