Validate GnuCash website

[Tim M]

XHTML 1.0 and HTML 4.01 Strict are nearly identical.  Personally I like some
of the XHTML code styles betters (such as <br /> instead of <br></br>) so I
would shoot for that, but I would start off trying to get it to validate
against HTML 4.01 Transitional first.

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Derek Atkins <derek at ihtfp.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Fri, July 29, 2011 4:22 pm, Cristian Marchi wrote:
> > While working on the beta website, i just checked how it validates [1]
> > and there are many errors. I'm not an expert in this field so I'm asking
> > if it's worth to correct them? If yes, is it better to use a HTML 4.01
> > strict or a XHTML 1.0 strict doctype.
>
> I don't have an opinion here.  Maybe others will.
>
> > Always talking about website, the Search page is not rendered correctly
> > [2]. Does someone know what's going on?
>
> I know about the search page.  I haven't had the chance to look into it.
> It's been broken since the upgrade to Fedora 15.  And namazu is no longer
> part of Fedora.   So perhaps we should just look for a new search engine?
>
> > Thanks for any advice.
> >
> > Regards
> > Cristian
> >
> > [1]
> >
> http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gnucash.org%2Fbeta%2F&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0&user-agent=W3C_Validator%2F1.2
> > [2] https://lists.gnucash.org/search/
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnucash-devel mailing list
> > gnucash-devel at gnucash.org
> > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
> >
>
> -derek
>
> --
>       Derek Atkins                 617-623-3745
>       derek at ihtfp.com             www.ihtfp.com
>       Computer and Internet Security Consultant
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-devel mailing list
> gnucash-devel at gnucash.org
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
>