Invoices broken in SVN HEAD?

[Geert Janssens]

Hmm,

I thought I tested the const fixes thouroughly. I'm a little short on time 
now, I'll look into it later.

Thanks for reporting this.

Geert

On woensdag 12 oktober 2011, Mike Evans wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 Oct 2011 11:32:32 Mike Evans wrote:
> > Since my original mail didn't get quoted in...
> > 
> > > System: Fedora 14.
> > > 
> > > Creating a new invoice in SVN appears to be broken.
> > > Steps to reproduce:
> > > Create a new invoice, assign an owner and a job.
> > > Fill in the fields for description, hours, rate,  qty.
> > > While the line is still current the correct values are shown in the
> > > Subtotal. Tab or enter to next line, the subtotal is blank and the
> > > invoice status values are all zero.
> > > 
> > > Same when adding another line.
> > > 
> > > I'm no sure exactly when this became broken but it is fairly recent.
> > > 
> > > Sample logfile output:
> > > 
> > > * 10:09:13  WARN <gnc.engine> bad value in our entry
> > > * 10:09:13  WARN <gnc.engine> bad value in our entry
> > > * 10:09:13  WARN <gnc.engine> bad value in our entry
> > > * 10:09:13  WARN <gnc.gui> [PrintAmountInternal()] Bad numeric:
> > > GNC_ERROR_OVERFLOW.
> > > * 10:09:13  WARN <gnc.gui> [PrintAmountInternal()] Bad numeric:
> > > GNC_ERROR_OVERFLOW.
> > > * 10:09:13  WARN <gnc.gui> [PrintAmountInternal()] Bad numeric:
> > > GNC_ERROR_ARG. * 10:09:14  WARN <gnc.gui> [PrintAmountInternal()] Bad
> > > numeric:
> > > GNC_ERROR_OVERFLOW.
> > > * 10:09:14  WARN <gnc.gui> [PrintAmountInternal()] Bad numeric:
> > > GNC_ERROR_OVERFLOW.
> > > * 10:09:15  WARN <gnc.gui> [PrintAmountInternal()] Bad numeric:
> > > GNC_ERROR_OVERFLOW.
> > > * 10:09:15  WARN <gnc.gui> [PrintAmountInternal()] Bad numeric:
> > > GNC_ERROR_OVERFLOW.
> > > * 10:09:17  WARN <gnc.gui> [PrintAmountInternal()] Bad numeric:
> > > GNC_ERROR_OVERFLOW.
> > > * 10:09:19  WARN <gnc.gui> [PrintAmountInternal()] Bad numeric:
> > > GNC_ERROR_OVERFLOW.
> > > 
> > > Mike E
> > 
> > On Wednesday 12 Oct 2011 11:24:58 Mike Evans wrote:
> > Using git bisect:
> > git bisect bad
> > Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this (roughly 0 steps)
> > [e81afcf75a7f5945f65e542e2193bcb116eae390] Some const correctness
> > improvements in owner and invoice functions
> > 
> > r21411 | gjanssens | 2011-10-10 13:34:58 +0100 (Mon, 10 Oct 2011) | 2
> > lines
> > 
> > Some const correctness improvements in owner and invoice functions
> > 
> > Mike E
> 
> More info.
> The error only occurs when a job is specified for the invoice.
> Mike E