Backport or not ?

[Geert Janssens]

On 22-06-12 17:29, John Ralls wrote:
> The SQL backend doesn't ever look at the table version, just writes 
> it. The same is true of GNUCASH_RESAVE_VERSION. The only mechanism 
> that stops loading an updated database would seem to be in the XML 
> backend. Seems Phil and I wrote the first part (store the version) 
> before shipping 2.4 and never wrote the checks afterward. A 
> qof_session_safe_save() would force a rewrite of the database and 
> would therefore lose the new weekly_adjust field... but that's only 
> triggered by a GNC_BACKEND_TOO_OLD, and there's no code to emit that 
> in the SQL backend. Yeah, just backport it. 
Done.

Thanks for all the feedback.

Geert