Gnucash 2.5/6

Mike Evans mikee at
Mon Feb 18 09:50:41 EST 2013

On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 13:55:40 -0800 (PST)
Phil Longstaff <phil.longstaff at> wrote:

> I created and
> attached an initial patch to that.  That should allow you to get it
> in.  I'll need to learn more about git.
> Phil
> ________________________________
>  From: John Ralls <jralls at>
> To: Robert Fewell <14ubobit at>; Geert Janssens
> <janssens-geert at> Cc: "gnucash-devel at Devel"
> <gnucash-devel at> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 2:22:39
> PM Subject: Re: Gnucash 2.5/6
> On Feb 9, 2013, at 1:45 PM, lsl <14ubobit at> wrote:
> > I am still plodding on with this and it is progressing slowly, have
> > uploaded another patch to the bug which also indicates roughly what
> > is left to do. I am not sure of any time scales but the menu
> > options can be disabled or the whole lot can be removed if it is
> > holding other things up.
> > 
> > Assuming it is still viable, I will continue and progress it as time
> > permits.
> Is this mostly working? If so, let's get it into trunk and ditch the
> old register. That will at least let us get rid of the project Ridley
> deprecated libraries. It will also get more people banging on it,
> which will bring any problems to light.
> Pending that and Phil's budgeting, I'm thinking we can release 2.5.0
> next week.
> Regards,
> John Ralls

I just tested Robert Fewell's patch in Bug 673193 and I realised it
makes my reverse sort (Bug 683881, commit 679d59e44) work obsolete as
sorting order can be changed by simply clicking in the column header.
If the TreeView is going to become the standard then think I should
remove my commit and mark the bug as obsolete. 


Mike Evans

Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.

More information about the gnucash-devel mailing list