jralls at ceridwen.us
Mon Feb 18 10:44:04 EST 2013
On Feb 18, 2013, at 6:50 AM, Mike Evans <mikee at saxicola.idps.co.uk> wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 13:55:40 -0800 (PST)
> Phil Longstaff <phil.longstaff at yahoo.ca> wrote:
>> I created https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694047 and
>> attached an initial patch to that. That should allow you to get it
>> in. I'll need to learn more about git.
>> From: John Ralls <jralls at ceridwen.us>
>> To: Robert Fewell <14ubobit at gmail.com>; Geert Janssens
>> <janssens-geert at telenet.be> Cc: "gnucash-devel at gnucash.org Devel"
>> <gnucash-devel at gnucash.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 2:22:39
>> PM Subject: Re: Gnucash 2.5/6
>> On Feb 9, 2013, at 1:45 PM, lsl <14ubobit at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I am still plodding on with this and it is progressing slowly, have
>>> uploaded another patch to the bug which also indicates roughly what
>>> is left to do. I am not sure of any time scales but the menu
>>> options can be disabled or the whole lot can be removed if it is
>>> holding other things up.
>>> Assuming it is still viable, I will continue and progress it as time
>> Is this mostly working? If so, let's get it into trunk and ditch the
>> old register. That will at least let us get rid of the project Ridley
>> deprecated libraries. It will also get more people banging on it,
>> which will bring any problems to light.
>> Pending that and Phil's budgeting, I'm thinking we can release 2.5.0
>> next week.
>> John Ralls
> I just tested Robert Fewell's patch in Bug 673193 and I realised it
> makes my reverse sort (Bug 683881, commit 679d59e44) work obsolete as
> sorting order can be changed by simply clicking in the column header.
> If the TreeView is going to become the standard then think I should
> remove my commit and mark the bug as obsolete.
Aside from that, what do you think of the TreeView register? Do you think that it's ready to release in 2.5.0 this week?
More information about the gnucash-devel