Content of gnucash-patches/gnucash-changes
Christian Stimming (mobil)
christian at cstimming.de
Sat Jun 1 15:10:59 EDT 2013
Geert Janssens <janssens-geert at telenet.be> schrieb:
>1. Which lists are you subscribed to ?
> a. gnucash-changes
> b. gnucash-patches
> c. both
> d. none
B. Only -patches.
>2. If you're only subscribed to one, why that one ?
Due to occasional bandwidth constraints I don't want the full diff every time.
>3. Do you think gnucash needs two lists ? Why yes or why no ?
Yes. Both workflows are useful and chosen by various developers.
>4. For the future:
> a. We should keep the two list as they are now:
> gnucash-changes should have the detailed logs
> gnucash-patches should have the summaries
> b. We should keep two lists, but swap the contents:
> gnucash-patches should have the detailed logs
> gnucash-changes should have the summaries
> c. I think we only need one list with detailed logs
> d. I think we only need one list with summaries
A. Keep everything as before. Reason: I'm lazy and prefer not to change settings anywhere.
>You may motivate your answers :)
>gnucash-devel mailing list
>gnucash-devel at gnucash.org
Sent from mobile.
More information about the gnucash-devel