Content of gnucash-patches/gnucash-changes
Mike Alexander
mta at umich.edu
Fri May 31 12:04:28 EDT 2013
On May 31, 2013, at 4:52 AM, Geert Janssens <janssens-geert at telenet.be> wrote:
>
> 1. Which lists are you subscribed to ?
> a. gnucash-changes
> b. gnucash-patches
> c. both
> d. none
gnucash-patches only
> 2. If you're only subscribed to one, why that one ?
If I want to look at the details of the change it's easy enough to do so and the summaries are all I normally need.
>
> 3. Do you think gnucash needs two lists ? Why yes or why no ?
I don't really care, but one list is probably enough
>
> 4. For the future:
> a. We should keep the two list as they are now:
> gnucash-changes should have the detailed logs
> gnucash-patches should have the summaries
> b. We should keep two lists, but swap the contents:
> gnucash-patches should have the detailed logs
> gnucash-changes should have the summaries
> c. I think we only need one list with detailed logs
> d. I think we only need one list with summaries
Anything other than c is fine with me. However, all the repositories should be the same. As it is now I get detailed logs for htdocs and summaries for everything else.
Mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4385 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-devel/attachments/20130531/9d2e46f8/attachment.p7s>
More information about the gnucash-devel
mailing list