Swig code generation - git src vs tarball src
Geert Janssens
geert.gnucash at kobaltwit.be
Sat Mar 28 06:16:19 EDT 2015
Our build system behaves differently when a build is started from a git
cloned repository or from a release tarball: swig interface files are
only converted into c files when building from git. The tarball assumes
these should be present.
What is the original reason it was implemented this way ? Or put
differently is there (still) a good reason to avoid on the fly swig code
generation for a (release) tarball build ?
It seems to me these diverging code paths are needlessly complicating
the code.
Background: I ran into this while trying to set up a nightly build
system for fedora/rhel rpms. Based on the guidelines I found for
Fedora's copr and tito tools I'm trying to build from a tarball that is
created from the git repository (not via make dist).
The build system detects it's not running from git and will fail because
the swig generated files are missing.
Pretending I'm building from git using BUILDING_FROM_SCM=yes will cause
the build to fail as well when trying to extract version information
from git...
I'm not sure my experiment is achievable. But it got me thinking about
this diverging code path in our source anyway. So to summarize again:
What is the original reason it was implemented this way ? Or put
differently is there (still) a good reason to avoid on the fly swig code
generation for a (release) tarball build ?
Regards,
Geert
More information about the gnucash-devel
mailing list