Version Numbering

Herbert Thoma herbert.thoma at iis.fraunhofer.de
Sun Mar 29 02:37:30 EDT 2015


Am 29.03.2015 um 00:02 schrieb Chris Good:
> I think it is generally agreed, (from the small number of opinions
> expressed so far), that level 2 should be Major and level 3 should be Minor.
> Can everyone that has an opinion please let us know, particularly regarding
> the level 1 name?

Well, IIRC, we bumped the first level from 1 to 2 when we switched from
Gnome 1 to Gnome 2. So "historically" it is may be a Framework version.

Gnome 2 support may end some time, so that we will be forced to change
the framework (like last time ...). This could trigger the next first
level version bump. However, this would not feel very good, to be forced
by external dependencies.

On the other hand, Linux recently decided that version number don't have
any meaning at all. They change the first level number when Linus feels
like changing it ...

  Herbert.


More information about the gnucash-devel mailing list