Version Numbering

[Geert Janssens]

On Saturday 30 May 2015 17:12:08 John Ralls wrote:
> > On May 30, 2015, at 3:24 PM, Chris Good <chris.good at ozemail.com.au>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > Hi John & Geert,
> > 
> > Everybody has had a chance to express their opinion now.
> > There doesn't seem to be a consensus on what the version number
> > segments should be called in the community as a whole.
> > There has been a lot of good information emerge that I would like to
> > document in to the Development Process wiki section.
> > 
> > If you can both agree on a naming scheme, I think we should go with
> > whatever you both think.
> > How about Geert's latest suggestion: fundamental.major.bugfix ?
> > 
> > Or should I just document them as
> > FirstSegment.SecondSegment.ThirdSegment?
> Well, I still don’t care much for “fundamental”, but it’s better than
> anything else we’ve come up with so let’s go with it.
> 
> Regards,
> John Ralls

Agreed.

Geert