jralls at ceridwen.us
Sat May 30 20:12:08 EDT 2015
> On May 30, 2015, at 3:24 PM, Chris Good <chris.good at ozemail.com.au> wrote:
> Hi John & Geert,
> Everybody has had a chance to express their opinion now.
> There doesn't seem to be a consensus on what the version number segments
> should be called in the community as a whole.
> There has been a lot of good information emerge that I would like to
> document in to the Development Process wiki section.
> If you can both agree on a naming scheme, I think we should go with whatever
> you both think.
> How about Geert's latest suggestion: fundamental.major.bugfix ?
> Or should I just document them as FirstSegment.SecondSegment.ThirdSegment?
Well, I still don’t care much for “fundamental”, but it’s better than anything else we’ve come up with so let’s go with it.
More information about the gnucash-devel