Reports: Utilization of urls
carsten.rinke at gmx.de
Fri Mar 11 11:35:20 EST 2016
I have to admit, I am not sure if I get the point.
"who knows, what will be in 2 years"
certainly true, but if there is in option to add the fixes into master
(more or less) now, why not adding it to maint, too?
What will be the difference in 2 years?
(note: I am refering to small changes, be it bugfixes or enhancements)
"that would be different if you asked for replacement"
These would mean to me big changes. These should only go to master,
according to my understanding, unless something really weird shows up
(e.g. jqplot turns out to be nothing more than a virus... - don't get me
wrong, I like jqplot!)
"much room for improvements"
On 11.03.2016 15:40, Frank H. Ellenberger wrote:
> Hallo Carsten,
> Am 10.03.2016 um 18:58 schrieb Carsten Rinke:
>> I have the same point of view regarding the categorization:
>> This is adding an optional representation mode to existing reports. Not
>> making up new reports.
>> This option is available already for the networth line chart (even
>> though differently implemented), so I rather see this a bug fix instead
>> of a new feature.
>> At the same time I see this a minor modification. So waiting 2 years to
>> make this available for other users .... that is a looooong way. But it
>> has happened before that I have underestimated the complexity of the
>> issue ....
> Perhaps another aspect:
> I assume, you would now help us to fix issues in your modifications, but
> who know, what will be in 2 years.
> That would be different, if you asked for replacement of jqplot or
> webkit by some much cooler stuff.
> IMHO the reports are after the documentation the part of GC, where is
> much room for improvements.
More information about the gnucash-devel