Gnome dropping Bugzilla

[Herbert Mühlburger]

What about using Jira?

-- 
Herbert Mühlburger

Email: mail at muehlburger.at
Web: https://blog.muehlburger.at

Am Mo, 31. Jul 2017, um 21:56, schrieb John Ralls:
> As I think everyone knows, we use bugzilla.gnome.org
> <http://bugzilla.gnome.org/> for bug and enhancement tracking.
> 
> There's a new banner on every BZ page saying that Gnome plans to drop
> Bugzilla and the CGit repository browser, replacing them with Gitlab.
> 
> That isn't going to work for us. I don't think it's going to work for
> Gnome, either, because a bug tracker that can't do word searches isn't
> capable of managing thousands of open bugs
> (https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/search/index.html
> <https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/search/index.html>), but that's not our
> problem. Our problem is that with our repository not at git.gnome.org
> <http://git.gnome.org/> there won't be a GnuCash project in GitLab and so
> there won't be a bug tracker. We'll need to get a new one.
> 
> Since we do mirror our repos to Github it is a viable option and it does
> at least have better search facilities (or at least they're better
> documented) that Gitlab, see
> https://help.github.com/articles/searching-issues-and-pull-requests/
> <https://help.github.com/articles/searching-issues-and-pull-requests/>.
> It lacks many other features of BZ: All categorization and status
> tracking is by "labels" and they have no inherent hierarchy or
> organization.
> 
> So I think we're going to need our own bugtracker.
> 
> BZ is Free and it should be fairly simple to get the Gnome bug team to
> ship us a dump of our part of the database and set up a redirect once we
> have our instance up and running. The web display on whatever it is that
> GNU uses (e.g. https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?group=guile
> <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?group=guile>) but I dislike that it is
> operated entirely by email. Mantis is popular but is managed by a bug
> list. It's filterable to a fare-thee-well but lacks controlled
> vocabularies on many of its fields so managing a large number of open
> bugs is a PITA. RT (used by perl's CPAN) is also completely email driven.
> Trac is a little less rudimentary than Github--it at least has categories
> and status fields, but I don't believe it's capable of managing thousands
> of bugs. SourceForge's built in tracker is on the same level as Github's
> with less capable search.
> 
> There's a sort of conceptual timeline on the DevelopmentInfrastructure
> page but nothing concrete. I'd guess we have at least several months and
> perhaps as long as a year to have a replacement up and running.
> 
> Regards,
> John Ralls
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-devel mailing list
> gnucash-devel at gnucash.org
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel