What version of txf export used in windows version 2.6.19

Alex Aycinena alex.aycinena at gmail.com
Fri Feb 2 19:29:01 EST 2018


Jeffrey,

I don't recall where I got it, but I will send a copy directly to your
email when I can get to the machine that it is on.

Regards,

Alex

On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 4:10 PM, jeffrey black <beastmaster126 at hotmail.com>
wrote:

> On 1/30/2018 3:41 PM, Alex Aycinena wrote:
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Jeffrey Black <beastmaster126 at hotmail.com>
>> To: gnucash-devel at gnucash.org
>> Cc:
>> Bcc:
>> Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2018 18:13:02 -0700 (MST)
>> Subject: What version of txf export used in windows version 2.6.19
>> I tried importing my txf output file into H&R block Premium 2017, hoping
>> it
>> works this year.  It doesn't.  I know they have a problem with importing,
>> it
>> creates multiple copies of schedules C and F.  That is their problem not
>> GnuCash.
>>
>> I am under U.S. 1040 tax code.  Using windows version 2.6.19 of GnuCash.
>>
>> 3 questions.
>>
>> 1)  Looking in the txf.scm file it looks like you are using V42 not V41
>> from
>> the date fields. IE.
>>
>>     (cons 'N370 #(none "Sched F" "Custom hire (machine work)" 1 #t ""
>> ((2012
>> "7") (2011 "7a or b") (1990 "9"))))
>>
>> Which version is it actually exporting?  V41 or V42?  The header says V41.
>>
>>
> The latest version as of the report re-write was V41, dated 6/16/06, which
> was used. The dates you see are used for the report formatting and have
> nothing to do with the TXF output or the version of the txf spec. It has
> not been updated, yet, to version 42 because I did not know of it until
> just now.
>
>
>
>> 2)  Also, there is very little information available about the internal
>> format of a .TXF file.  In Windows, does it matter if each line with data
>> ends in a carriage return <CR>, then followed by a blank line of only
>> <CR><LF> ?    IE:
>>
>> V041<CR>
>> <CR><LF>
>> AGnuCash 2.6.19<CR>
>> <CR><LF>
>> D01/26/2018<CR>
>> <CR><LF>
>> ^<CR>
>> etc..
>>
>>
> I don't know the answer to that specifically. When the report was first
> re-written there was a problem initially on the Windows platform with line
> endings that was fixed and tested by the user on Windows that reported the
> problem. I don't recall what tax software he used. You could test the
> relevance of the blank lines by using a text editor with a small sample to
> try different combinations and see if you get different results.
>
>
>
>> 3)  there are only 685 codes in V041 and 717 codes in Version 042, all 3
>> digits.  Where did you find the codes with four digits?
>>
>>
> There is a TXF Spec for Business "Business Tax Exchange Format for Forms
> 1065, 1120, 1120S, 990, 990-PF, 990-T", V41, that was used.
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> --JEffrey Black M.B.A.
>>
>
>
>  Regards,
>
> Alex
>
> Alex:
>
> Thank you for the information.
>
> Hopefully GnuCash V3 will have increased support for all of the V42 tax
> codes.  I will add it to the wish list.  And while I am at it, wish that
> Inuit and co-conspirators would update the TXF to V43 (not likely), so it
> fits more of the new or updated forms.
>
> Considered doing a build of GnuCash on my own, with the V42 codes and
> quickly rejected the idea.  I do not have time right now to even begin to
> attempt to update all of the related source code.
>
> As for importing TXF files containing references to schedules C and F, H&R
> Block's techs have absolutely no idea how to do it either.  Meaning they do
> not support it.  Thankfully the printed report generated by GnuCash lists
> the form and last known line where data goes.  Anything that makes filling
> out IRS forms faster and easier is a god send.
>
> In regards to the V41 business tax codes, I have been unable to locate the
> specs for it.  Can and would you point me to a link for it?
>
> --JEffrey Black M.B.A.
>
>
>


More information about the gnucash-devel mailing list