Feedback about 2.7.8
subscriptions+listen at rohland.net
Wed Mar 28 10:19:45 EDT 2018
> The description is something for me (the user) to add notes about the transaction and is basically irrelevant for anyone else
we might argue about that.
I find it at least inconsistent since the transaction description is in fact protected by the reconciliation of a single split.
> Am 28.03.2018 um 15:54 schrieb Alen Siljak <alen.siljak at gmx.com>:
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 at 3:46 PM
>> From: "Christoph R" <subscriptions+listen at rohland.net>
>> To: gnucash-devel <gnucash-devel at gnucash.org>
>> Subject: Feedback about 2.7.8
>> But I can change the description of a reconciled split without a warning. I need to file a bug report on that.
> Chris, I'm just wondering - why would a change of description require re-reconciliation?
> Somehow, I'd expect that the date and amount are the relevant fields. The description is something for me (the user) to add notes about the transaction and is basically irrelevant for anyone else, therefore not requiring re-reconciliation with another account statement (i.e. bank or credit card statement). Just wondering what your case is.
More information about the gnucash-devel