transaction auto-completion

[Phillip J Shelton]

Dave Peticolas wrote:

> Phillip J Shelton writes:
> > Was not the suggestion to only not copy the memo's?  You can copy
> > splits with out memo's??
>
> Right, but the reason offered was that they were not visible.
> If you're not going to copy things which aren't displayed,
> then for consistency you shouldn't be copying any part of
> splits. Only omitting memo fields seems rather arbitrary
> and unintuitive. What is the underlying principle?
>
> dave

Ok.  I had not thought that one out.  Perhaps , if the UI is not too crowed
allready, have some switch that allowed for different amounts of stuff copied??