postgres backend ???

[Linas Vepstas]

On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 10:50:13PM -0600, Matthew Vanecek was heard to remark:
> 
> Accounting uses a very distinct data model. The current PG backend
> loosely follows that data model, and the rewrite will be even closer. 

I'm not sure of what the antecedent is.

When I wrote the pg backend, I made it 'more' correct than the engine,
and was planning on changing the engine to make it resemble the pg
backend.  So I'm concerned about the 'even closer' remark.

On the other hand:
-- the business modules make new demands, and I don't understand these.
-- neither lots nor books are supported.  Books, partly so, I think.
   We'll need these.

Linas.



-- 
pub  1024D/01045933 2001-02-01 Linas Vepstas (Labas!) <linas at linas.org>
PGP Key fingerprint = 8305 2521 6000 0B5E 8984  3F54 64A9 9A82 0104 5933
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20030127/33b00957/attachment.bin