Process vendor payments and negative values
Graham Leggett
minfrin at sharp.fm
Mon Apr 26 06:50:12 EDT 2004
Derek Atkins wrote:
> I dont understand what you mean here. Just because you process payments
> in reverse order shouldn't mean anything. So long as you don't change
> the posted invoices then the payments will eventually add up. For example:
>
> Jan 1 invoice $100
> Feb 1 invoice $150
> Feb 15 payment -$150
> Feb 20 payment -$100
>
> This should all add up just fine. The $150 will apply $100 to the
> Jan 1 invoice and $50 to the Feb 1 invoice. Then the Feb 20 payment
> will apply the remaining $100 to the Feb 1 invoice.
>
> So, unless you changed any values after-the-fact, it should be just
> fine.
>
> Hmm, now that I think about it... It _might_ cause a problem if you:
> post invoice, apply payment (such that invoice is paid), then unpost
> the invoice, reduce its amount, and then repost it. I _think_ this is
> handled correctly, but it might not be.
I think this is possibly what happened - I remember a few months back
that bills had been posted with the wrong dates (affecting the VAT
calculations), and were corrected.
I did a further test by applying an extra arbitrary payment of R1000 to
the account to see where it came off. It resulted in a payable aging
that looked like this:
30 days: R0.00
60 days: R0.00
90 days: R0.00
120 days: R-1000.00
Should the amount not have been listed under 30 days instead?
> Sure there is! Check your A/R account. There is 80.30 from 30 days
> ago and 80.30 from 120+ days ago.
There isn't - all the bill amounts are in the region of around R1200
each, the stray amount represents the difference between a bill and a
debit order payment that was incorrectly made, then corrected.
> What is a "negative amount"? There are "invoices" and there are
> "payments". You cannot have a "negative invoice" nor can you have a
> "negative payment". Also, you can only have one "invoice" per lot.
> So, if you somehow got an invoice+payment lot out of balance by, say,
> hand-modifying a payment transaction, that could easily have caused
> this problem. But I don't know what you mean by the above.
None of the payments have been hand modified that I can remember.
Can I send you a copy of the file privately so you can see what is
happening? It's a bit difficult to explain.
Regards,
Graham
--
More information about the gnucash-user
mailing list