Aha!

[David T.]

Oh. Derek said that it was account code/name, and that was where Mike
responded, and I followed on.

If it's only sorted by the clickable headings, then there's nothing more to
say.

David

--- Josh Sled <jsled at asynchronous.org> wrote:

> "David T." <sunfish62 at yahoo.com> writes:
> > I think that Mike raises a very valid point--if you're going to sort a
> display,
> > you really *should* display the field on which the display is sorted.
> > Otherwise, a user is left in the dark.
> 
> Some poking about reveals that we don't in fact sort via "name, then account
> code" with the current account model and GtkTreeView.
> 
> The tree view headers are clickable in the standard [A->Z, Z->A, «unsorted»]
> sequence, but only for the separate columns as they exist in the model.
> 
> I'm not sure of a good way to display a "composite" sort like "name, then
> account code".  I guess doing the sorts in order (sort by Account Name, then
> sort by Account Code) might get the desired effect.
> 
> -- 
> ...jsled
> http://asynchronous.org/ - a=jsled; b=asynchronous.org; echo ${a}@${b}
> 



       
____________________________________________________________________________________Ready for the edge of your seat? 
Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV. 
http://tv.yahoo.com/