[gnucash] Which Report?

[Jean-David Beyer]

Josh Sled wrote:
> Vahur Lokk <vahur.lokk at gmail.com> writes:
>> And, finally, I fail to see any positive side in this kind of setup.
> 
> Well, it's Correct. ;) [*]
> 
> If crappy email clients are always worked around, what incentive is there
> for them to be fixed?
> 
> FWIW, most of the mailing lists I'm on don't munge Reply-To ...
> traditional listservs and yahoo groups, in particular.  I'm just in the
> habit of doing Reply-To-All (F in gnus, Shift-Ctrl-R in Evo, ...) when
> dealing with lists.
> 
One of the troubles with hitting "Reply To All" is that I then get one reply
from the mailing list and one from the sender, so I get everything twice.

I notice, also, that ALL the senders get a copy. I imagine that each of them
gets one from me and one from the list. Doubles the input to their e-mail
client. I manually deleted them this time, but I do not always notice this.

Now my experience is that this is not the only list that behaves in this
way; some do, some do not. It is clearly possible to set them up either way.
But that is worse than a standard. Because I can never remember which is which.

So whether it is "correct" or not, it seems to me that if the e-mail client
sends the stuff, the e-mail should be the one replied to. But this argument
is already lost.

-- 
  .~.  Jean-David Beyer          Registered Linux User 85642.
  /V\  PGP-Key: 9A2FC99A         Registered Machine   241939.
 /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey    http://counter.li.org
 ^^-^^ 06:10:01 up 14 days, 12:27, 0 users, load average: 4.34, 4.36, 4.27