Any Interest in Configurable Imbalance name

[Donald Allen]

On Jan 4, 2008 11:18 AM, Jason Ahrens <jason at cougarcorp.net> wrote:
> Donald Allen said the following on 04/01/2008 7:00 AM:
> > Yep, that's what I was saying above, except that I didn't express my
> >
> <snip>
> > little of that). I think the underlying behavior is the real  issue
> > and that's what needs to be addressed.
> >
>
> I actually don't mind the Imbalance accounts. Every now and then I screw
> something up and notice that the Imbalance account has a non-0 balance,
> so I have to fix something.
>
> As long as the ability for accounts with an imbalanced transaction in
> them, and finding those imbalanced transactions is easy, I'm happy. I
> found the Imbalanced account a functional and obvious way to do this. I
> do agree though that sometimes Gnucash seems a little too eager to
> assign transactions into it (i.e.: When I'm still editing values in a
> split and haven't finalized it yet... Though I think Gnucash assumes
> that if I press "enter", it means I'm done...)

Did you ever use v1.8.x? I'm trying to find out if you ever
experienced the behavior some of us (Derek, Adam, me) are advocating
returning to.

/Don

>
> Jason
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> -----
>
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>