Any Interest in Configurable Imbalance name

[Pelton, Brian]

Not Always....

The original question in this topic was to find out if a patch would be
accepted to add a configuration value.

The consensus was that adding configuration was clutter.  Based on this,
I would speculate that there is no interest in adding configuration that
automatically deletes the imbalance account.  Automatically creating
account is one thing, but to automatically delete one is a bit more
risky IMHO.  

It is probably for the best.  I found the best solution for me was to
make the imbalance account a child of my suspense account.  Its hidden
away unless I need / want to look at it.

--Brian

-----Original Message-----
From: gnucash-user-bounces at gnucash.org
[mailto:gnucash-user-bounces at gnucash.org] On Behalf Of Andrew
Sackville-West
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 3:46 PM
To: gnucash-user at gnucash.org; gnucash-user at lists.gnucash.org
Subject: Re: Any Interest in Configurable Imbalance name

On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 03:15:49PM -0500, Daniel Rucci wrote:
> Since this topic of Imbalance & Orphan's came up.. I don't mind the 
> names at all but it would be nice if they were auto-deleted or 
> auto-hidden when they became empty.

/me channels warlord...

patches welcome :-D

A